Who it’s for
- Blocks with weak service-charge visibility or poor budgeting.
- RTM companies and freeholders reviewing whether current demands hold up.
- Buildings where reserve funding and recovery need a more structured process.
Cleaner budgets, compliant demands, and proper discipline across the full service-charge cycle.
We help blocks move from vague estimates and reactive chasing into a structured annual budget, demand, collection and year-end reporting process.
Who it’s for
What’s included
Sits outside the brief
What the proposal sets out
Changing managing agents only helps if the new one actually fixes the underlying problems.
Budgets that are hard to explain or defend to leaseholders.
Poor visibility on what the service charge is actually funding.
Reserve balances that are unclear or obviously under-planned.
How we stabilise the building file, reset responsibilities, and start the recurring management rhythm.
Step 1
We assess the existing budget, demand history, reserve position and any obvious compliance or transparency gaps.
Step 2
We prepare the new budget with supporting rationale and set the issue and collection process for the coming cycle.
Step 3
We monitor collection, variances, the reserve position and the year-end process so the numbers stay visible.
The scope, controls and delivery detail that matter before you appoint anyone.
Budget preparation, demand issue, collection monitoring, reserve-fund planning and year-end reconciliation. All run as a proper cycle that stands up to scrutiny, not a spreadsheet pulled together at the last minute.
Budgeting only works when leaseholders can see the logic. We focus on line-by-line clarity, prior-year comparison and demands that meet statutory requirements as standard, not as small print.
The building type, the current setup, the issues that need fixing first, and we’ll come back with a proper proposal.