Who it’s for
- Freeholders, RTM companies and RMCs planning qualifying works.
- Blocks entering long-term service agreements that may trigger consultation.
- Clients who need recoverability protected before costs are committed.
Section 20 done properly. The consultation is treated as a compliance workflow, not an afterthought, because recoverability depends on it.
We run Section 20 consultations for residential blocks where major works or long-term agreements trigger the statutory process and the cost-recovery risk is too high to handle informally.
Who it’s for
What’s included
Sits outside the brief
What the proposal sets out
Changing managing agents only helps if the new one actually fixes the underlying problems.
Uncertainty over whether proposed works or contracts trigger consultation.
Leaseholder challenges caused by weak notices or poor process.
A risk that costs can't be recovered properly if the file is defective.
How we stabilise the building file, reset responsibilities, and start the recurring management rhythm.
Step 1
We confirm whether the proposed works or agreement need consultation and build the timetable around the project.
Step 2
Notices are prepared and served, observations managed, and the file kept defensible.
Step 3
We document the award-stage position and keep the audit trail clear for later review.
The scope, controls and delivery detail that matter before you appoint anyone.
Threshold review, notice preparation, service of notices, leaseholder observations, tender coordination and the award-stage record needed for cost recovery. We treat it as a compliance workflow, not paperwork bolted onto a works project.
A defective consultation can undermine recovery through the service charge. We focus on process discipline, evidence of service and a clean audit trail, so the file holds up if challenged.
The building type, the current setup, the issues that need fixing first, and we’ll come back with a proper proposal.