Who it’s for
- Blocks planning works where contractor choice will materially affect cost and quality.
- Decision-makers who want a cleaner record of procurement decisions.
- Buildings that need a more formal process than single-source appointment.
A more defensible way to appoint contractors, proper tendering, due diligence, and a clear paper trail.
For residential blocks where tendering, due diligence and the appointment process matter to cost, resident confidence and later accountability.
Who it’s for
What’s included
Sits outside the brief
What the proposal sets out
Changing managing agents only helps if the new one actually fixes the underlying problems.
Informal contractor appointments with weak documentation.
Quotes that can't be compared because the scope keeps changing.
A concern that price is being treated as the only criterion.
How we stabilise the building file, reset responsibilities, and start the recurring management rhythm.
Step 1
We agree the scope, tender format, evaluation criteria and any Section 20 or CDM interfaces before quotes are requested.
Step 2
We collect comparable pricing, review compliance and competence, and structure the decision file properly.
Step 3
We present the recommendation with reasoning, supporting record and the next steps clearly set out.
The scope, controls and delivery detail that matter before you appoint anyone.
More than collecting a few prices. Competence, insurance, scope alignment, health-and-safety readiness, and whether the contractor can actually deliver the work being tendered for the building.
A clearer audit trail on why a contractor was appointed. That matters to freeholders, directors and any later challenge from residents, auditors or advisers.
The building type, the current setup, the issues that need fixing first, and we’ll come back with a proper proposal.